Escape from Philosophy: a Rejoinder to the Thom Brooks Reply

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The reply begins by stating that responses to reviews of EfL are “taking criticism of their philosophical claims as personal attacks” and resorting to “hysterical ad hominems”. On the contrary, the responses to around fourteen—often highly positive—reviews have welcomed all their criticisms and simply replied to them. None of these replies appear to commit the ad hominem (to the man) fallacy: that of addressing the qualities of a person as a way of attempting to undermine or defend an argument or assertion made by that person.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-02-08
Latest version: 3 (2022-01-20)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
94 ( #48,157 of 65,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #16,934 of 65,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.