What is ‘mental action’?

Philosophical Psychology 32 (6):971-993 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There has been a resurgence of interest lately within philosophy of mind and action in the category of mental action. Against this background, the present paper aims to question the very possibility, or at least the theoretical significance, of teasing apart mental and bodily acts. After raising some doubts over the viability of various possible ways of drawing the mental act/bodily act distinction, the paper draws some lessons from debates over embodied cognition, which arguably further undermine the credibility of the distinction. The insignificance of the distinction is demonstrated in part by showing how the focus on ‘inner’ acts hampers fruitful discussion of Galen Strawson’s skepticism of mental agency. Finally, the possibility is discussed that a distinction between covert and overt action should supplant the one between mental and bodily action.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Bounds of Cognition.Adams, Frederick & Aizawa, Kenneth

View all 52 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
198 ( #21,788 of 50,281 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #18,170 of 50,281 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.