The Art of Immoral Artists

In Carl Fox & Joe Saunders (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Media Ethics. New York: Routledge (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The primary aim of this chapter is to outline the consensuses that have emerged in recent philosophical works tackling normative questions about responding to immoral artist’s art. While disagreement amongst philosophers is unavoidable, there is actually much agreement on the ethics of media consumption. How should we evaluate immoral artist’s art? Philosophers generally agree that we should not always separate the artist from the art. How should we engage with immoral artist’s art? Philosophers generally agree that we should not always reflexively turn away from them. In turn, these responses reveal that moral value is not autonomous from aesthetic value, and neither dominates the other. The secondary aim of this chapter is to explore the ramifications of this revelation. I argue that, in addition to an ethics of media consumption, we need an aesthetics of media consumption that is fundamentally social rather than solitary.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LIATAO-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-10-28
Latest version: 3 (2022-01-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-10-28

Total views
228 ( #29,178 of 65,558 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
228 ( #2,039 of 65,558 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.