Beardsley on literature, fiction, and nonfiction

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper attempts to revive interest in the speech act theory of literature by looking into Monroe C. Beardsley's account in particular. Beardsley's view in this respect has received, surprisingly, less attention than deserved. I first offer a reconstruction of Beardsley's account and then use it to correct some notable misconceptions. Next, I show that the reformulation reveals a hitherto unnoticed discrepancy in Beardsley's position and that this can be explained away by a weak version of intentionalism that Beardsley himself actually tolerates. Finally, I assess the real difficulty of Beardsley's theory and its relevance today.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LINBOL
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Intentional Fallacy: Defending Beardsley.Dickie, George & Wilson, W. Kent
On the Creation of Art.Beardsley, Monroe C.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-20

Total views
90 ( #28,034 of 42,948 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #18,348 of 42,948 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.