How to cancel the Knobe effect: the role of sufficiently strong moral censure

American Philosophical Quarterly 58 (2):181-186 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Empirical support is offered for the claim that the original Knobe effect, whereby our intentional action ascriptions exhibit certain asymmetries in light of our moral attitudes, can be successfully cancelled. This is predicted by the view that the Knobe effect can be explained in purely pragmatic terms (Adams and Steadman 2004a, 2004b, 2007). However, previous cancelling studies (Adams and Steadman 2007; Nichols and Ulatowski 2007) have failed to identify evidence of cancellability. The key to the successful cancelling strategy presented here is to provide subjects with the opportunity to assent to statements that involve sufficiently strong forms of moral censure.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LINHTC
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-04-03
Latest version: 4 (2021-04-01)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-04-03

Total views
99 ( #42,760 of 2,439,471 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #28,873 of 2,439,471 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.