Must we act only on what we know?

Journal of Philosophy 106 (8):463-473 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
What relation is there between knowledge and action? According to Hawthorne and Stanley, where your choice is p-dependent, it is appropriate to treat the proposition that p as a reason for acting iff you know that p (RKP). In this paper, I shall argue that it is permissible to treat something as a reason for action even if it isn't known to be true and address Hawthorne and Stanley's arguments for RKP.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LITMWA
Revision history
Archival date: 2009-04-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-04-13

Total views
845 ( #2,421 of 40,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
77 ( #6,368 of 40,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.