Neither/Nor

In Casey Doyle, Joe Milburn & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), New Issues in Epistemological Disjunctivism. Routledge (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Abstract: On one formulation, epistemological disjunctivism is the view that our perceptual beliefs constitute knowledge when they are based on reasons that provide them with factive support. Some would argue that it is impossible to understand how perceptual knowledge is possible unless we assume that we have such reasons to support our perceptual beliefs. Some would argue that it is impossible to understand how perceptual experience could furnish us with these reasons unless we assume that the traditional view of experience is mistaken. For reasons explained here, I think that the epistemological argument for metaphysical disjunctivism rests on mistaken assumptions about reasons and their rational role. Neither disjunctivist view is needed to understand how perceptual knowledge is possible.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LITN-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-11-11
Latest version: 2 (2019-06-30)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-11-11

Total views
168 ( #24,660 of 50,380 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #16,450 of 50,380 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.