Vagueness & Modality—An Ecumenical Approach

Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1):229-269 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
How does vagueness interact with metaphysical modality and with restrictions of it, such as nomological modality? In particular, how do definiteness, necessity (understood as restricted in some way or not), and actuality interact? This paper proposes a model-theoretic framework for investigating the logic and semantics of that interaction. The framework is put forward in an ecumenical spirit: it is intended to be applicable to all theories of vagueness that express vagueness using a definiteness (or: determinacy) operator. We will show how epistemicists, supervaluationists, and theorists of metaphysical vagueness like Barnes and Williams (2010) can interpret the framework.  We will also present a complete axiomatization of the logic we recommend to both epistemicists and local supervaluationists. 
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LITVM
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-10-19
Latest version: 4 (2017-04-16)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
A Theory of Metaphysical Indeterminacy.Barnes, Elizabeth & Williams, J. Robert G.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Epistemicism and Modality.Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani
Reply to Yli-Vakkuri.Williamson, Timothy

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-19

Total views
312 ( #13,960 of 48,836 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #27,090 of 48,836 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.