Countable Additivity, Idealization, and Conceptual Realism

Economics and Philosophy (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper addresses the issue of finite versus countable additivity in Bayesian probability and decision theory -- in particular, Savage's theory of subjective expected utility and personal probability. I show that Savage's reason for not requiring countable additivity in his theory is inconclusive. The assessment leads to an analysis of various highly idealised assumptions commonly adopted in Bayesian theory, where I argue that a healthy dose of, what I call, conceptual realism is often helpful in understanding the interpretational value of sophisticated mathematical structures employed in applied sciences like decision theory. In the last part, I introduce countable additivity into Savage's theory and explore some technical properties in relation to other axioms of the system.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-01-26
Latest version: 2 (2019-05-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
[Omnibus Review].Jech, Thomas

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
117 ( #25,397 of 43,699 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #9,224 of 43,699 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.