Incomplete Preference and Indeterminate Comparative Probability

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The notion of comparative probability defined in Bayesian subjectivist theory stems from an intuitive idea that, for a given pair of events, one event may be considered “more probable” than the other. Yet it is conceivable that there are cases where it is indeterminate as to which event is more probable, due to, e.g., lack of robust statistical information. We take that these cases involve indeterminate comparative probabilities. This paper provides a Savage-style decision-theoretic foundation for indeterminate comparative probabilities.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LIUIPA
Revision history
First archival date: 2020-02-07
Latest version: 2 (2020-02-24)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-02-07

Total views
37 ( #41,911 of 46,428 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #22,480 of 46,428 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.