Subjective Unpossessed Reasons

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):262-270 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A common assumption in contemporary debates about normative reasons is that ‘subjective’ and ‘possessed’ are two names for the same sort of reason. This paper challenges that assumption. Given our cognitive limitations, it is unsurprising that normative reasons that derive from what we know and reasons that we are in a position to use in our deliberation are not always one and the same.

Author's Profile

Artūrs Logins
University of Zürich


Added to PP

204 (#38,621)

6 months
46 (#22,461)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?