Why Naive Realism?

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (2pt2):211-237 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Much of the discussion of Naive Realism about veridical experience has focused on a consequence of adopting it—namely, disjunctivism about perceptual experience. However, the motivations for being a Naive Realist in the first place have received relatively little attention in the literature. In this paper, I will elaborate and defend the claim that Naive Realism provides the best account of the phenomenal character of veridical experience
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-07-31
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Transparency of Experience.Martin, Michael G. F.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A New Perceptual Adverbialism.D’Ambrosio, Justin

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
973 ( #2,693 of 46,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
103 ( #5,825 of 46,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.