Ethics, Rights, and White's Antitrust Skepticism

The Antitrust Bulletin 61 (2):336-341 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Mark White has developed a provocative skepticism about antitrust law. I first argue against three claims that are essential to his argument: the state may legitimately constrain or punish only conduct that violates someone’s rights, the market’s purpose is coordinating and maximizing individual autonomy, and property rights should be completely insulated from democratic deliberation. I then sketch a case that persons might have a right to a competitive market. If so, antitrust law does deal with conduct that violates rights. The main thread running throughout the article is that what counts as a legitimate exercise of property rights is dynamic, sensitive to various external conditions, and is the proper object of democratic deliberation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-04-14
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
209 ( #29,359 of 2,449,140 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #23,638 of 2,449,140 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.