Against 'Against 'Against Vague Existence''

In Karen Bennett & Dean Zimmerman (eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics Volume 11. Oxford University Press. pp. 278-287 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Alessandro Torza argues that Ted Sider’s Lewisian argument against vague existence is insufficient to rule out the possibility of what he calls ‘super-vague existence’, that is the idea that existence is higher-order vague, for all orders. In this chapter it is argued that the possibility of super-vague existence is ineffective against the conclusion of Sider’s argument since super-vague existence cannot be consistently claimed to be a kind of linguistic vagueness. Torza’s idea of super-vague existence seems to be better suited to model vague existence under the assumption that vague existence is instead a form of ontic indeterminacy, contra what Ted Sider and David Lewis assume.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOSAAA
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Theory of Metaphysical Indeterminacy.Barnes, Elizabeth & Williams, J. Robert G.
Parts of Classes.LEWIS, David

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-07-26

Total views
96 ( #25,179 of 40,656 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #9,710 of 40,656 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.