Exploring the informational sources of metaperception: The case of Change Blindness Blindness

Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1489-1501 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Perceivers generally show a poor ability to detect changes, a condition referred to as “Change Blindness” . They are, in addition, “blind to their own blindness”. A common explanation of this “Change Blindness Blindness” is that it derives from an inadequate, “photographical” folk-theory about perception. This explanation, however, does not account for intra-individual variations of CBB across trials. Our study aims to explore an alternative theory, according to which participants base their self-evaluations on two activity-dependent cues, namely search time and perceived success in prior trials. These cues were found to influence self-evaluation in two orthogonal ways: success-feedback influenced self-evaluation in a global, contextual way, presumably by recalibrating the norm of adequacy for the task. Search time influenced it in a local way, predicting the success of a given trial from its duration
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LOUETI
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Change Blindness.Simons, Daniel J. & Levin, Daniel T.
The Secret Life of Fluency.Oppenheimer, Daniel M.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Epistemic Feelings and Epistemic Emotions (Focus Section).Arango-Muñoz, Santiago & Michaelian, Kourken

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-08-05

Total views
259 ( #12,520 of 41,562 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #11,248 of 41,562 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.