Must Egalitarians Condemn Representative Democracy?

Social Theory and Practice 1 (1):171-198 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Many contemporary democratic theorists are democratic egalitarians. They think that the distinctive value of democracy lies in equality. Yet this position faces a serious problem. All contemporary democracies are representative democracies. Such democracies are highly unequal: representatives have much more power than do ordinary citizens. So, it seems that democratic egalitarians must condemn representative democracies. In this paper, I present a solution to this problem. My solution invokes popular control. If representatives are under popular control, then their extra power is not objectionable. Unfortunately, so I argue, in the United States representatives are under loose popular control.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-02-09
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
67 ( #51,295 of 2,448,952 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #20,089 of 2,448,952 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.