Kant's fact of reason as source of normativity

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (6):596 – 608 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In _The Sources of Normativity_, Christine M. Korsgaard argues that unconditional obligation can be accounted for in terms of practical identity. My argument in this paper is that practical identity cannot play this foundational role. More specifically, I interpret Korsgaard's argument as beginning with something analogous to Kant's fact of reason, viz. with the fact that our minds are reflective. I then try to show that her determination of this fact is inadequate and that this causes the argument concerning practical identity to fail. Finally, I argue that a conception of the fact of reason more in line with what I take to be Kant's own is necessary to account for unconditional obligation.

Author's Profile

Bryan Lueck
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville


Added to PP

209 (#37,836)

6 months
45 (#22,033)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?