Anaphoric Deflationism and Theories of Meaning

In Theodora Achourioti, Edgar Andrade & Marc Staudacher (eds.), Proceedings of the Amsterdam Graduate Philosophy Conference. Meaning and Truth. Amsterdam, October 1-3, 2009. ILLC Publications. pp. 52-66 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is widely held that truth and reference play an indispensable explanatory role in theories of meaning. By contrast, so-called deflationists argue that the functions of these concepts are merely expressive and never explanatory. Robert Brandom has proposed both a variety of deflationism — the anaphoric theory —, and a theory of meaning — inferentialism — which doesn’t rely on truth or reference. He argues that the anaphoric theory counts against his (chiefly referentialist) rivals in the debate on meaning and thereby paves the way for inferentialism. In this paper, I give a friendly reconstruction of anaphoric deflationism (section II) and point to a distinguishing feature of the theory with respect to other deflationist proposals. While Brandom simply assumes, but doesn’t earn this feature, I propose a natural argument to justify it (section III). Then, however, I point out a subtle but clear sense in which truth and reference can play a role in explaining meaning, even if the anaphoric theory holds. Thus, anaphoric deflationism will turn out to be neutral in the debate on meaning (section IV).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LWEADA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-04-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Deflationism: The Basics.Armour-Garb, Bradley & Beall, J. C.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total views
132 ( #19,120 of 38,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #20,399 of 38,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.