The Pragmatic Hypothesis Testing Theory of Self-Deception and the Belief/Acceptance Distinction

Philosophy:1-25 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to the pragmatic hypothesis testing theory, how much evidence we require before we believe something varies depending on the expected costs of falsely believing and disbelieving it. This theory has been used in the self-deception debate to explain our tendencies towards self-deceptive belief formation. This article argues that the application of this theory in the self-deception debate has overlooked the distinction between belief and acceptance, and that the theory in all likelihood models acceptance rather than belief, in which case it is probably not relevant to the explanation of self-deception. It is suggested, however, that doxastic error costs might be relevant to explaining some types of self-deception, though they feature in an evolutionary explanation of it rather than a psychological one.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2022-08-04
Latest version: 3 (2022-08-04)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #66,841 of 71,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #22,017 of 71,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.