Should Reliabilists Be Worried About Demon Worlds?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The New Evil Demon Problem is supposed to show that straightforward versions of reliabilism are false: reliability is not necessary for justification after all. I argue that it does no such thing. The reliabilist can count a number of beliefs as justified even in demon worlds, others as unjustified but having positive epistemic status nonetheless. The remaining beliefs---primarily perceptual beliefs---are not, on further reflection, intuitively justified after all. The reliabilist is right to count these beliefs as unjustified in demon worlds, and it is a challenge for the internalist to be able to do so as well.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LYOSRB
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-07-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowing Full Well.Sosa, Ernest
What is Justified Belief.Goldman, Alvin I.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Evil Demon Inside.Silins, Nicholas

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-07-13

Total views
665 ( #3,077 of 38,963 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #10,560 of 38,963 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.