Epistemological Disjunctivism and the New Evil Demon

Acta Analytica 29 (1):61-70 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In common with traditional forms of epistemic internalism, epistemological disjunctivism attempts to incorporate an awareness condition on justification. Unlike traditional forms of internalism, however, epistemological disjunctivism rejects the so-called New Evil Genius thesis. In so far as epistemological disjunctivism rejects the New Evil Genius thesis, it is revisionary. After explaining what epistemological disjunctivism is, and how it relates to traditional forms of epistemic internalism / externalism, I shall argue that the epistemological disjunctivist’s account of the intuitions underlying the New Evil Genius thought experiment is at best incomplete. As presented, therefore, epistemological disjunctivism is unable to accommodate the core guiding intuitions of epistemic internalism. Given the stated aim of not being revisionary on this score, the view is at a dialectical disadvantage over the traditional forms of epistemic internalism the position is meant to replace. Unfortunately, therefore, at present, the impasse between internalism and externalism remains.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MADEDA
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-05-31
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology.Conee, Earl & Feldman, Richard
Without Justification.Sutton, Jonathan
Theory of Knowledge.Chisholm, Roderick M.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Varieties of Externalism.Carter, J. Adam; Kallestrup, Jesper; Palermos, S. Orestis & Pritchard, Duncan

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-05-31

Total views
573 ( #4,058 of 39,700 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #11,039 of 39,700 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.