Judging Covers

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (4):361-370 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cover versions form a loose but identifiable category of tracks and performances. We distinguish four kinds of covers and argue that they mark important differences in the modes of evaluation that are possible or appropriate for each: mimic covers, which aim merely to echo the canonical track; rendition covers, which change the sound of the canonical track; transformative covers, which diverge so much as to instantiate a distinct, albeit derivative song; and referential covers, which not only instantiate a distinct song, but for which the new song is in part about the original song. In order to allow for the very possibility of transformative and referential covers, we argue that a cover is characterized by relation to a canonical track rather than merely by being a new instance of a song that had been recorded previously

Author Profiles

P. D. Magnus
State University of New York, Albany
Christy Mag Uidhir
University of Houston

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-10

Downloads
408 (#42,020)

6 months
81 (#55,968)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?