John Stuart Mill on Taxonomy and Natural Kinds

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The accepted narrative treats John Stuart Mill’s Kinds as the historical prototype for our natural kinds, but Mill actually employs two separate notions: Kinds and natural groups. Considering these, along with the accounts of Mill’s nineteenth-century interlocutors, forces us to recognize two distinct questions. First, what marks a natural kind as worthy of inclusion in taxonomy? Second, what exists in the world that makes a category meet that criterion? Mill’s two notions offer separate answers to the two questions: natural groups for taxonomy and Kinds for ontology. This distinction is ignored in many contemporary debates about natural kinds and is obscured by the standard narrative that treats our natural kinds just as a development of Mill’s Kinds.
Reprint years
2015
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAGJSM
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Taxonomy, Ontology, and Natural Kinds.P. D. Magnus - 2018 - Synthese 195 (4):1427-1439.
Epistemic Categories and Causal Kinds.P. D. Magnus - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 48:263-266.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-04

Total views
185 ( #20,184 of 45,590 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #18,028 of 45,590 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.