John Stuart Mill on Taxonomy and Natural Kinds

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The accepted narrative treats John Stuart Mill’s Kinds as the historical prototype for our natural kinds, but Mill actually employs two separate notions: Kinds and natural groups. Considering these, along with the accounts of Mill’s nineteenth-century interlocutors, forces us to recognize two distinct questions. First, what marks a natural kind as worthy of inclusion in taxonomy? Second, what exists in the world that makes a category meet that criterion? Mill’s two notions offer separate answers to the two questions: natural groups for taxonomy and Kinds for ontology. This distinction is ignored in many contemporary debates about natural kinds and is obscured by the standard narrative that treats our natural kinds just as a development of Mill’s Kinds.
Reprint years
2015
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAGJSM
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-09-04

Total views
302 ( #18,003 of 56,905 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #17,855 of 56,905 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.