Philosophical Quarterly 64 (256):471-477 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The Homeostatic Property Cluster (HPC) account of natural kinds has become popular since it was proposed by Richard Boyd in the late 1980s. Although it is often taken as a defining natural kinds as such, it is easy enough to see that something's being a natural kind is neither necessary nor sufficient for its being an HPC. This paper argues that it is better not to understand HPCs as defining what it is to be a natural kind but instead as providing the ontological realization of (some) natural kinds.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
201 ( #30,925 of 64,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #38,700 of 64,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.