Taxonomy, ontology, and natural kinds

Synthese 195 (4):1427-1439 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
When we ask what natural kinds are, there are two different things we might have in mind. The first, which I’ll call the taxonomy question, is what distinguishes a category which is a natural kind from an arbitrary class. The second, which I’ll call the ontology question, is what manner of stuff there is that realizes the category. Many philosophers have systematically conflated the two questions. The confusion is exhibited both by essentialists and by philosophers who pose their accounts in terms of similarity. It also leads to misreading philosophers who do make the distinction. Distinguishing the questions allows for a more subtle understanding of both natural kinds and their underlying metaphysics.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAGTOA
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-07-19

Total downloads
105 ( #19,666 of 35,943 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #10,215 of 35,943 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.