Deception: From Ancient Empires to Internet Dating [Book Review]

Philosophy in Review 32 (4):275-278 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this review of Brooke Harrington's edited collection of essays on deception, written by people from different disciplines and giving us a good "status report" on what various disciplines have to say about deception and lying, I reject social psychologist Mark Frank's taxonomy of passive deception, active consensual deception, and active non-consensual deception (active consensual deception is not deception), as well as his definition of deception as "anything that misleads another for some gain" ("for gain" is a reason for engaging in deception, not part of its definition). I also take issue with management professor Guido Mollering's claim that all deception involves a violation of trust.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAHROD
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-01-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-01-27

Total views
602 ( #7,956 of 57,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #17,246 of 57,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.