How Not to Argue from Science to Skepticism

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 4 (1):21-35 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


For at least several decades, and arguably since the time of Descartes, it has been fashionable to offer scientific or quasi-scientific arguments for skepticism about human knowledge. I critique five attempts to argue for skeptical conclusions from the findings of science and scientifically informed common sense.

Author's Profile

Stephen Maitzen
Acadia University


Added to PP

569 (#13,994)

6 months
40 (#24,587)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?