How Not to Not Change the Subject (And How to Actually Not Change the Subject)

Southwest Philosophy Review (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sally Haslanger (2020a, 2020b) proposes a way for semantic amelioration to avoid the ‘topic continuity problem’ (TCP) in conceptual engineering. TCP maintains that changing a concept’s content replaces the concept. Since this occurs in semantic amelioration, semantic amelioration necessarily seems an instance of conceptual replacement. Haslanger rejects this, however, maintaining that a concept’s function is essential to it, not its content. And since semantic amelioration doesn’t change a concept’s function, semantic amelioration isn’t conceptual replacement, according to Haslanger. In this paper, I argue that Haslanger’s account of semantic amelioration requires a change in a concept’s function. Thus, semantic amelioration is in fact conceptual replacement on Haslanger’s account. To fix this, I propose combining Amie Thomasson’s (2020) work on concepts with Haslanger’s to yield a new functional essentialist view of concepts.

Author's Profile

John Mancini
University of Virginia

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-10-02

Downloads
75 (#96,202)

6 months
75 (#72,920)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?