An Emergent Language of Paradox: Riffs on Steven M. Rosen’s Kleinian Signification of Being

Cosmos and History 13 (1):315-342 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

First, I briefly recapitulate the main points of Rosen’s article, namely, that the word “Being” does not adequately signify the paradoxical unification of subject and object and that the Klein bottle can serve as a more appropriate sign -vehicle than the word. I then propose to apply his insight more widely; however, in order to do that, it is first necessary to identify infra- and exostructures of language, including culture, category structure, logic, metaphor, semantics, syntax, concept, and sign vehicles, that preserve the status quo and keep subject and object disjunct. After analyzing those infra/exostructures, I engage a complementary process of integrating them, coagula, in order to spark ideas for innovating ways in which more of those facets of language can embrace paradox.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-28

Downloads
273 (#61,501)

6 months
61 (#77,392)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?