Amelioration v. Perversion

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
[Forthcoming in Shifting Concepts: The philosophy and psychology of conceptual variability, edited with Åsa Wikforss for OUP] Words change meaning, usually in unpredictable ways. But some words’ meanings are revised intentionally. Revisionary projects are normally put forward in the service of some purpose – some serve specific goals of inquiry, and others serve ethical, political or social aims. Revisionist projects can ameliorate meanings, but they can also pervert. In this paper, I want to draw attention to the dangers of meaning perversions, and argue that the self-declared goodness of a revisionist project doesn’t suffice to avoid meaning perversions. The road to Hell, or to horrors on Earth, is paved with good intentions. Finally and more importantly, I want to demarcate what meaning perversions are. This, I hope, can help us assess the moral and political legitimacy of revisionary projects.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARAVP-5
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-05-05
Latest version: 2 (2019-05-12)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-05

Total views
96 ( #25,179 of 40,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
96 ( #4,775 of 40,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.