Looking for the Lazy Argument Candidates

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The Lazy Argument, as it is preserved in historical testimonies, is not logically conclusive. In this form, it appears to have been proposed in favor of part-time fatalism (including past time fatalism). The argument assumes that free will assumption is unacceptable from the standpoint of the logical fatalist but plausible for some of the nonuniversal or part-time fatalists. There are indications that the layout of argument is not genuine, but taken over from a Megarian source and later transformed. The genuine form of the argument seems to be given in different form and far closer to Megarian logical fatalism and its purpose is not to defend laziness. If the historical argument has to lead to a logically satisfactory solution, some additional assumptions and additional tuning is needed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2011-11-13
Latest version: 4 (2012-03-16)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
An Essay on Free Will.Van Inwagen, Peter
Bringing About the Past.Dummett, Michael
Fatalism.Taylor, Richard

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
393 ( #11,064 of 50,083 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #28,050 of 50,083 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.