Looking for the Lazy Argument Candidates

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The Lazy Argument, as it is preserved in historical testimonies, is not logically conclusive. In this form, it appears to have been proposed in favor of part-time fatalism (including past time fatalism). The argument assumes that free will assumption is unacceptable from the standpoint of the logical fatalist but plausible for some of the nonuniversal or part-time fatalists. There are indications that the layout of argument is not genuine, but taken over from a Megarian source and later transformed. The genuine form of the argument seems to be given in different form and far closer to Megarian logical fatalism and its purpose is not to defend laziness. If the historical argument has to lead to a logically satisfactory solution, some additional assumptions and additional tuning is needed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARLFT
Upload history
First archival date: 2011-11-13
Latest version: 4 (2012-03-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-11-13

Total views
424 ( #12,534 of 57,110 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #31,340 of 57,110 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.