La logique symbolique en débat à Oxford à la fin du XIXe siècle : les disputes logiques de Lewis Carroll et John Cook Wilson

Revue D’Histoire des Sciences 67 (2):185-205 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The development of symbolic logic is often presented in terms of a cumulative story of consecutive innovations that led to what is known as modern logic. This narrative hides the difficulties that this new logic faced at first, which shaped its history. Indeed, negative reactions to the emergence of the new logic in the second half of the nineteenth century were numerous and we study here one case, namely logic at Oxford, where one finds Lewis Carroll, a mathematical teacher who promoted symbolic logic, and John Cook Wilson, the Wykeham Professor of Logic who notoriously opposed it. An analysis of their disputes on the topic of logical symbolism shows that their opposition was not as sharp as it might look at first, as Cook Wilson was not so much opposed to the « symbolic » character of logic, but the intrusion of mathematics and what he perceived to be the futility of some of its problems, for logicians and philosophers alike.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-02-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Universals.J. P. Moreland,
Introduction to Logic.Borgers, Alfons
John Cook Wilson.Marion, Mathieu

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Simplex Sigillum Veri: Peano, Frege, and Peirce on the Primitives of Logic.Bellucci, Francesco; Moktefi, Amirouche & Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
149 ( #24,248 of 46,294 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #23,895 of 46,294 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.