On Philosophers Misunderstood

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Sometimes philosophers have been misunderstood. It could be because the philosopher's communication was vague. It could also be because the philosopher didn't use Ockham's razor and multiplied terms unnecessarily forcing reviewers to impose the razor, with the result that what needs to be cut is not cut and what was essential is taken out of the equation. This article cites two cases, one of the Indian thinker M.M. Thomas and other of Peter Van Inwagen, who claimed that their thoughts were misrepresented by some other well known thinker.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAROPM-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-01-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-01-16

Total views
67 ( #47,227 of 2,425,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #56,428 of 2,425,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.