Socrates' Defensible Devices in Plato's Meno

Theory and Research in Education 17 (2):165-180 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Despite how revered Socrates is among many educators nowadays, he can seem in the end to be a poor model for them, particularly because of how often he refutes his interlocutors and poses leading questions. As critics have noted, refuting people can turn them away from inquiry instead of drawing them in, and being too directive with them can squelch independent thought. I contend, though, that Socrates' practices are more defensible than they often look: although there are risks in refuting people and posing leading questions, Socrates has sensible ways of minimizing the risks, ways that are feasible even for teachers nowadays, and there are times when the risks are worth taking. I illustrate my point by discussing Plato's _Meno_.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MARSDD-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-06-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-09-07

Total views
45 ( #45,633 of 52,731 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #13,562 of 52,731 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.