Debating the Significance of Disagreement: A Review of John Pittard's Diagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment [Book Review]

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Richard Feldman’s “Reasonable Religious Disagreements” launched debates about the epistemic significance of disagreement that have been a dominant point of discussion in epistemology as of late. While most of these debates have been concerned with disagreement more generally, Feldman’s original focus was religious disagreement, and John Pittard returns the focus to religious disagreement in Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment. Pittard’s book delves deeply into debates about the significance of disagreement with a foot in both epistemology and philosophy of religion. It is the first book to look at these issues as they are being addressed within each of these sub-disciplines and is sure to be a significant contribution to the debates in both sub-fields.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MATDTS-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-07-17
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-07-17

Total views
67 ( #51,111 of 2,448,502 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #32,804 of 2,448,502 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.