Linguistic practice and false-belief tasks

Mind and Language 25 (3):298-328 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Jill de Villiers has argued that children's mastery of sentential complements plays a crucial role in enabling them to succeed at false-belief tasks. Josef Perner has disputed that and has argued that mastery of false-belief tasks requires an understanding of the multiplicity of perspectives. This paper attempts to resolve the debate by explicating attributions of desires and beliefs as extensions of the linguistic practices of making commands and assertions, respectively. In terms of these linguistic practices one can explain why desire-talk will precede belief-talk and why even older children will have difficulty attributing incompatible desires

Author Profiles

Matthew Van Cleave
Lansing Community College
Christopher Gauker
University of Salzburg


Added to PP

1,061 (#11,098)

6 months
130 (#24,211)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?