Strategies of judicial review. Exercising judicial discretion in administrative cases involving business entities

E&Y Better Government Programme (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This report presents the results of a research project which examined how Polish administrative courts exercise discretionary powers when deciding cases related to business activity. When a business enterprise asks the court to review actions taken by administration, judges decide whether an administrative body has used its powers in accordance with the law. The law in this case includes both the relevant statutory regulations but also more general principles originating from other sources, such as the Constitution or European Union law. It is generally accepted that in such cases courts have discretion, i.e. are able to select legal standards on which to base their judgments and to decide how to apply such standards to the case at hand. This does not mean, of course, that administrative court judges can do what they please. But, within some well-established boundaries, they can select from among various rules and principles those legal standards which apply to the case before them, interpret their meaning, and assess their importance. We aim to understand this process
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MATSOJ
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-03-18
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-03-18

Total views
197 ( #22,170 of 51,189 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #38,232 of 51,189 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.