Metascience. For a Scientific General Discourse

Mεtascience 1:online (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Human produce discourses on the world: mythologies, religions, mysticisms, philosophies, science. The majority of those discourses are transcendent in nature. Following a conceptual clarification based on the notions of reflection and general discourse, philosophy appears as a transcendent general discourse among others; hence the failure of the latter to account for the world and science; hence the need for a non-transcendent general discourse, a properly scientific general discourse, a metascience. In light of these redefined boundaries, it will be proposed to base metascience on an interpretation of Mario Bunge’s work. This interpretation is based on a set of general postulates that Mario Bunge adheres to and taken for granted by scientists. It is proposed that supporting such a set of postulates without problematizing them in the manner of the philosophers, makes Bunge’s thinking no longer philosophical.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAUMFA
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-07-12
Latest version: 2 (2021-03-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-07-12

Total views
69 ( #53,363 of 65,538 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #30,016 of 65,538 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.