Science and meaning

The Philosophers' Magazine 18:15-16 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
How can we understand our human world, embedded as it is within the physical universe, in such a way that justice is done to both the richness, meaning and value of human life on the one hand, and what modern science tells us about the physical universe on the other hand? I argue that, in order to solve this problem, we need to see physics as being concerned only with a highly selected aspect of reality – that aspect which determines how events unfold – the causally efficacious aspect. Physics cannot describe the experiential, and if it is extended so that it does so, physical theory would cease to be explanatory. The human world can, however, be understood in terms of a different kind of explanation, which I call “personalistic”. This is not reducible to physical explanation. The world is, in short, riddled with what may be called “double comprehensibility”.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAXSAM-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total downloads
21 ( #29,341 of 33,149 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #15,418 of 33,149 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.