The Need for a Revolution in the Philosophy of Science

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There is a need to bring about a revolution in the philosophy of science, interpreted to be both the academic discipline, and the official view of the aims and methods of science upheld by the scientific community. At present both are dominated by the view that in science theories are chosen on the basis of empirical considerations alone, nothing being permanently accepted as a part of scientific knowledge independently of evidence. Biasing choice of theory in the direction of simplicity, unity or explanatory power does not permanently commit science to the thesis that nature is simple or unified. This current ‘paradigm’ is, I argue, untenable. We need a new paradigm, which acknowledges that science makes a hierarchy of metaphysical assumptions concerning the comprehensibility and knowability of the universe, theories being chosen partly on the basis of compatibility with these assumptions. Eleven arguments are given for favouring this new ‘paradigm’ over the current one.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAXTNF-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-01-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Four Decades of Scientific Explanation.Salmon, Wesley C. & Fagot-Largeault, Anne

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
411 ( #10,531 of 50,353 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #24,220 of 50,353 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.