Because I Believe It’s the Right Thing to Do

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):791-808 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Our beliefs about which actions we ought to perform clearly have an effect on what we do. But so-called “Humean” theories—holding that all motivation has its source in desire—insist on connecting such beliefs with an antecedent motive. Rationalists, on the other hand, allow normative beliefs a more independent role. I argue in favor of the rationalist view in two stages. First, I show that the Humean theory rules out some of the ways we ordinarily explain actions. This shifts the burden of proof onto Humeans to motivate their more restrictive, revisionary account. Second, I show that they are unlikely to discharge this burden because the key arguments in favor of the Humean theory fail. I focus on some of the most potent and most recent lines of argument, which appeal to either parsimony, the teleological nature of motivation, or the structure of practical reasoning
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MAYBIB
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-04-01
Latest version: 2 (2013-07-19)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael
.Shafer-Landau, Russ (ed.)
Moral Realism: A Defence.Shafer-Landau, Russ

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-04-30

Total views
741 ( #3,089 of 41,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
105 ( #4,324 of 41,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.