Constructing the context through goals and schemata: top-down processes in comprehension and beyond

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
My main purpose here is to provide an account of context selection in utterance understanding in terms of the role played by schemata and goals in top-down processing. The general idea is that information is organized hierarchically, with items iteratively organized in chunks—here called “schemata”—at multiple levels, so that the activation of any items spreads to schemata that are the most accessible due to previous experience. The activation of a schema, in turn, activates its other components, so as to predict a likely context for the original item. Since each input activates its own schemata, conflicting schemata compete with (and inhibit) each other, while multiple activations of a schema raise its likelihood to win the competition. There is therefore a double movement—with bottom-up activation of schemata enabling top-down prediction of other contextual components—triggered by multiple sources. Another claim of the paper is that goals are represented by schemata placed at the highest-levels of the executive hierarchy, in accordance with Fuster’s model of the brain as a hierarchically organized perception action cycle. This account can be considered, in part at least, a development of ideas contained in Relevance Theory, though it may imply that some other claims of the theory are in need of revision. Therefore, a secondary purpose of the paper is a contribution to the analysis of that theory.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-05-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Conscious, Preconscious, and Subliminal Processing: A Testable Taxonomy.Dehaene, Stanislas; Changeux, Jean-Pierre; Naccache, Lionel; Sackur, Jérôme & Sergent, Claire
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function.Miller, Earl K. & Cohen, Jonathan D.
Literal Meaning.Recanati, François
Meaning.Grice, H. Paul
Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-Reading.Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Relevance Theory, Pragmatic Inference and Cognitive Architecture.Yuan, Wen; Lin, Francis Y. & Cooper, Richard P.
Creative Argumentation: When and Why People Commit the Metaphoric Fallacy.Ervas, Francesca; Ledda, Antonio; Ojha, Amitash; Pierro, Giuseppe Antonio & Indurkhya, Bipin

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
98 ( #21,329 of 37,122 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #17,658 of 37,122 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.