Explanationism: Defended on All Sides

Logos and Episteme 6 (3):333-349 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Explanationists about epistemic justification hold that justification depends upon explanatory considerations. After a bit of a lull, there has recently been a resurgence of defenses of such views. Despite the plausibility of these defenses, explanationism still faces challenges. Recently, T. Ryan Byerly and Kraig Martin have argued that explanationist views fail to provide either necessary or sufficient conditions for epistemic justification. I argue that Byerly and Martin are mistaken on both accounts.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCCEDO-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-01-09

Total views
216 ( #21,607 of 52,879 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #13,366 of 52,879 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.