On Classical Motion

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The impetus theory of motion states that to be in motion is to have a non-zero velocity. The at-at theory of motion states that to be in motion is to be at different places at different times, which in classical physics is naturally understood as the reduction of velocities to position developments. I first defend the at-at theory against the criticism raised by Arntzenius that it renders determinism impossible. I then develop a novel impetus theory of motion that reduces positions to velocity developments. As this impetus theory of motion is by construction a mirror image of the at-at theory of motion, I claim that the two theories of motion are in fact epistemically on par—despite the unfamiliar metaphysical picture of the world furnished by the impetus version.
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCCOCM-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-01-29

Total views
263 ( #25,222 of 64,254 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #27,781 of 64,254 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.