Prediction in General Relativity

Synthese 194 (2):491-509 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Several authors have claimed that prediction is essentially impossible in the general theory of relativity, the case being particularly strong, it is said, when one fully considers the epistemic predicament of the observer. Each of these claims rests on the support of an underdetermination argument and a particular interpretation of the concept of prediction. I argue that these underdetermination arguments fail and depend on an implausible explication of prediction in the theory. The technical results adduced in these arguments can be related to certain epistemic issues, but can only be misleadingly or mistakenly characterized as related to prediction.
Reprint years
2015, 2017
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCCPIG
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Butterfield, Jeremy & Earman, John
Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination.Laudan, Larry & Leplin, Jarrett

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-07

Total views
93 ( #26,968 of 42,385 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #26,762 of 42,385 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.