Two purposes of knowledge-attribution and the contextualism debate

In David K. Henderson & John Greco (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, we follow Edward Craig?s advice: ask what the concept of knowledge does for us and use our findings as clues about its application conditions. What a concept does for us is a matter of what we can do with it, and what we do with concepts is deploy them in thought and language. So, we will examine the purposes we have in attributing knowledge. This chapter examines two such purposes, agent evaluation and informant-suggestion, and brings the results to bear on an important debate about the application conditions of the concept of knowledge?the debate between contextualists and their rivals.

Author's Profile

Matthew McGrath
Washington University in St. Louis

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-04

Downloads
340 (#64,286)

6 months
107 (#50,813)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?