Clifford and the Common Epistemic Norm

American Philosophical Quarterly 53 (3):245-258 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper develops a “Cliffordian” argument for a common epistemic norm governing belief, action, and assertion. The idea is that beliefs are the sorts of things that lead to actions and assertions. What each of us believes influences what we act on and assert, and in turn influences what those around us believe, act on, and assert. Belief, action, and assertion should be held to a common epistemic norm because, otherwise, this system will become contaminated. The paper finishes by drawing out the relativistic implications of the Cliffordian argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCKCAT-6
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-09-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge in an Uncertain World.Fantl, Jeremy & McGrath, Matthew
Norms of Assertion.Lackey, Jennifer

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-09-07

Total views
193 ( #20,048 of 46,263 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #19,112 of 46,263 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.