Harm or Mere Inconvenience? Denying Women Emergency Contraception

Hypatia 25 (1):11-30 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper addresses the likely impact on women of being denied emergency contraception (EC) by pharmacists who conscientiously refuse to provide it. A common view—defended by Elizabeth Fenton and Loren Lomasky, among others—is that these refusals inconvenience rather than harm women so long as the women can easily get EC somewhere else nearby. I argue from a feminist perspective that the refusals harm women even when they can easily get EC somewhere else nearby.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCLHOM-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-05-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Defense of Abortion.Thomson, Judith Jarvis

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-09-08

Total views
181 ( #19,469 of 44,298 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #18,580 of 44,298 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.