Agential Obligation as Non-Agential Personal Obligation plus Agency

Journal of Applied Logic 2 (1):117-152 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I explore various ways of integrating the framework for predeterminism, agency, and ability in[P.McNamara, Nordic J. Philos. Logic 5 (2)(2000) 135] with a framework for obligations. However,the agential obligation operator explored here is defined in terms of a non-agential yet personal obligation operator and a non-deontic (and non-normal) agency operator. This is contrary to the main current trend, which assumes statements of personal obligation always take agential complements. Instead, I take the basic form to be an agent’s being obligated to be such that p. I sketch some logics for agential obligation based on personal obligation and agency, first in a fairly familiar context that rules out conflicting personal obligations (and derivatively, conflicting agential obligations), and then in contexts that do allow for conflicts (of both sorts).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MCNAOA
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-04-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Two-Phase Deontic Logic.Van der Torre, Leon & Tan, Yao-hua

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-04-28

Total views
150 ( #16,854 of 38,049 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #18,919 of 38,049 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.