Agential Obligation as Non-Agential Personal Obligation plus Agency

Journal of Applied Logic 2 (1):117-152 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I explore various ways of integrating the framework for predeterminism, agency, and ability in[P.McNamara, Nordic J. Philos. Logic 5 (2)(2000) 135] with a framework for obligations. However,the agential obligation operator explored here is defined in terms of a non-agential yet personal obligation operator and a non-deontic (and non-normal) agency operator. This is contrary to the main current trend, which assumes statements of personal obligation always take agential complements. Instead, I take the basic form to be an agent’s being obligated to be such that p. I sketch some logics for agential obligation based on personal obligation and agency, first in a fairly familiar context that rules out conflicting personal obligations (and derivatively, conflicting agential obligations), and then in contexts that do allow for conflicts (of both sorts).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-04-28
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
369 ( #18,928 of 65,770 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #27,897 of 65,770 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.