Naturalizing Intentionality: Tracking Theories Versus Phenomenal Intentionality Theories

Philosophy Compass 9 (5):325-337 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper compares tracking and phenomenal intentionality theories of intentionality with respect to the issue of naturalism. Tracking theories explicitly aim to naturalize intentionality, while phenomenal intentionality theories generally do not. It might seem that considerations of naturalism count in favor of tracking theories. We survey key considerations relevant to this claim, including some motivations for and objections to the two kinds of theories. We conclude by suggesting that naturalistic considerations may in fact support phenomenal intentionality theories over tracking theories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-12-16
Latest version: 2 (2013-12-17)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What Do Philosophers Believe?Bourget, David & Chalmers, David J.
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.

View all 97 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A New Puzzle for Phenomenal Intentionality.Clutton, Peter & Sandgren, Alexander
Phenomenal Intentionality.Bourget, David & Mendelovici, Angela
Consciousness and Intentionality.Mendelovici, Angela & Bourget, David

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
1,485 ( #1,036 of 40,749 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
209 ( #1,746 of 40,749 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.